BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11778996)

  • 1. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation.
    Valentin L; Hagen B; Tingulstad S; Eik-Nes S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 11778996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
    Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
    Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 14(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 10623994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective internal validation of mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses: results from the international ovarian tumor analysis study.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Domali E; Lu C; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jan; 15(2):684-91. PubMed ID: 19147775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.
    Daemen A; Valentin L; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Ombelet W; Rossi A; Vergote I; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
    Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
    Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
    Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
    Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
    Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Characteristics of ovarian tumors with color Doppler sonography: a comparison of predictive models derived from two academic centers data].
    Smoleń A; Szpurek D; Czekierdowski A; Moszyński R
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 14674137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.