These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11779645)

  • 1. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses.
    Nuño N; Amabili M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11779645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem.
    Nuño N; Avanzolini G
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 12021006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
    Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
    Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of a debonded total hip stem with an unsupported distal tip.
    Norman TL; Saligrama VC; Hustosky KT; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 8872263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Burstein AH
    J Biomech; 1995 Sep; 28(9):1067-78. PubMed ID: 7559676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Nuño N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():90-100. PubMed ID: 25688031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement.
    Lu Z; McKellop H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Feb; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 9029302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of stem preheating and precooling on residual stress formation at stem/cement interface for cemented hip implants.
    Madrala A; Nuño N
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Apr; 93(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 20091924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):1047-58. PubMed ID: 1761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Aug; (329):326-36. PubMed ID: 8769468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Ingraffea AR
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Nov; 9(6):798-808. PubMed ID: 1919842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.