These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11780073)
1. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report. Schiermeier Q Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. German fraud inquiry casts a wider net of suspicion...as disillusionment reigns in task force. Abbott A Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6789):871-2. PubMed ID: 10879497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry. Abbott A; Schwarz J Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct. Vences M; Zardoya R Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anthropologists split over misconduct claims. Dalton R Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):5. PubMed ID: 11780079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory. Riis P J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science. Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(14):3-7. PubMed ID: 11649955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Publisher fraud. The publication of falsified medical research results]. Diehl V; Schütt I; Walshe R Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 125(38):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11147362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors. Cyranoski D Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer researcher found guilty of negligence. Schiermeier Q Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):258. PubMed ID: 12447407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Social scientists call for abolition of dishonesty committee. Abbott A Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):681. PubMed ID: 12610589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud. O'Reilly JT Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Should journals police scientific fraud? Marris E Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How far do you trust your colleagues? Neufeld A New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research foundation failed to charge professor with fraud offence [corrected]. Tuffs A BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7439):544. PubMed ID: 15001496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedure for investigation of research misconduct--active treatment or sham intervention? Wilmshurst P J R Soc Med; 2008 Nov; 101(11):524-5. PubMed ID: 19029346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]