These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11780145)

  • 1. Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar.
    Ward R; Danziger S; Owen V; Rafal R
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 5(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 11780145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An object-based frame of reference within the human pulvinar.
    Ward R; Arend I
    Brain; 2007 Sep; 130(Pt 9):2462-9. PubMed ID: 17704525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial and temporal deficits are regionally dissociable in patients with pulvinar lesions.
    Arend I; Rafal R; Ward R
    Brain; 2008 Aug; 131(Pt 8):2140-52. PubMed ID: 18669494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to visual threat following damage to the pulvinar.
    Ward R; Danziger S; Bamford S
    Curr Biol; 2005 Mar; 15(6):571-3. PubMed ID: 15797028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contralateral visual hemifield representations in the human pulvinar nucleus.
    Cotton PL; Smith AT
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 98(3):1600-9. PubMed ID: 17615131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oculomotor integration in patients with a pulvinar lesion.
    Van der Stigchel S; Arend I; van Koningsbruggen MG; Rafal RD
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3497-504. PubMed ID: 20691714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired visual search with paradoxically increased facilitation by emotional features after unilateral pulvinar damage.
    Lucas N; Bourgeois A; Carrera E; Landis T; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():223-239. PubMed ID: 31336355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impairments in spatial generalization of visual skills after V4 and TEO lesions in macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    De Weerd P; Desimone R; Ungerleider LG
    Behav Neurosci; 2003 Dec; 117(6):1441-7. PubMed ID: 14674862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar.
    Kastner S; O'Connor DH; Fukui MM; Fehd HM; Herwig U; Pinsk MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):438-48. PubMed ID: 13679404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual thalamocortical projections in the flying fox: parallel pathways to striate and extrastriate areas.
    Manger PR; Rosa MG
    Neuroscience; 2005; 130(2):497-511. PubMed ID: 15664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the human pulvinar in visual attention and action: evidence from temporal-order judgment, saccade decision, and antisaccade tasks.
    Arend I; Machado L; Ward R; McGrath M; Ro T; Rafal RD
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 171():475-83. PubMed ID: 18718343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia.
    Barton JJ; Cherkasova MV
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16043798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit representations of space after bilateral parietal lobe damage.
    Kim MS; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 13(8):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11784446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The space of senses: impaired crossmodal interactions in a patient with Balint syndrome after bilateral parietal damage.
    Valenza N; Murray MM; Ptak R; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1737-48. PubMed ID: 15351624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural hybrid model of semantic object memory: implications from event-related timing using fMRI.
    Kraut MA; Calhoun V; Pitcock JA; Cusick C; Hart J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Nov; 9(7):1031-40. PubMed ID: 14738284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The human pulvinar and stimulus-driven attentional control.
    Michael GA; Buron V
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 119(5):1353-67. PubMed ID: 16300441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual attention capacity after right hemisphere lesions.
    Habekost T; Rostrup E
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1474-88. PubMed ID: 17174988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pulvinar].
    Szirmai I
    Neuropsychopharmacol Hung; 2013 Mar; 15(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 23542756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.