BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11781018)

  • 1. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.
    Zelle J; Janssen D; Peeters S; Brouwer C; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 21074772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-cement interfacial behaviour under mixed mode loading conditions.
    Wang JY; Tozzi G; Chen J; Contal F; Lupton C; Tong J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jul; 3(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 20416553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 15099645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Optimizing the bone cement-implant interface by hydrolysis-resistant conditioning of the metal surface].
    Wirtz DC; Fischer H; Zilkens KW; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 10549124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed-mode fracture toughness of the cobalt-chromium alloy/polymethylmethacrylate cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bhashyam S
    J Orthop Res; 1999 May; 17(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 10376719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed-mode loading of the cement-bone interface: a finite element study.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Bertoldi K; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Feb; 14(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 21170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.
    Miller MA; Race A; Gupta S; Higham P; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 17197317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cement oscillation increases interlock strength at the cement-bone interface, with commentary.
    Wang Y; Han P; Gu W; Shi Z; Li D; Wang C
    Orthopedics; 2009 May; 32(5):325; discussion 325. PubMed ID: 19472963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The microscopic anatomy of the bone-cement interface in failed total hip arthroplasties.
    Johanson NA; Bullough PG; Wilson PD; Salvati EA; Ranawat CS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 May; (218):123-35. PubMed ID: 3568472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.