BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11781516)

  • 1. Distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study.
    Castrillon DH; Lee KR; Nucci MR
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jan; 21(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 11781516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.
    McCluggage WG; Sumathi VP; McBride HA; Patterson A
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jan; 21(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11781517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas: another viewpoint.
    Kamoi S; AlJuboury MI; Akin MR; Silverberg SG
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jul; 21(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 12068166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2.
    McCluggage WG; Shah R; Connolly LE; McBride HA
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 18156982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas: is a 2-marker (Vim/CEA) panel enough?
    Liao CL; Hsu JD; Lee MY; Kok LF; Li YJ; Wang PH; Yao CC; Han CP
    Virchows Arch; 2010 Apr; 456(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 20221633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. p16 INK4 and CEA can be mutually exchanged with confidence between both relevant three-marker panels (ER/Vim/CEA and ER/Vim/p16 INK4) in distinguishing primary endometrial adenocarcinomas from endocervical adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
    Han CP; Lee MY; Tyan YS; Kok LF; Yao CC; Wang PH; Hsu JD; Tseng SW
    Virchows Arch; 2009 Oct; 455(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 19763614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Value of ER, VIM, CEA and p16 detection in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas].
    Hu WW; Tao JH; Li GM; Xu X; Yang XM
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Mar; 30(3):526-8, 531. PubMed ID: 20335127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five commonly used markers (p53, TTF1, CK7, CK20, and CK34betaE12) are of no use in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study.
    Han CP; Kok LF; Lee MY; Wu TS; Ruan A; Cheng YW; Wang PH; Koo CL; Tyan YS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 19444461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study.
    Liao CL; Lee MY; Tyan YS; Kok LF; Wu TS; Koo CL; Wang PH; Chao KC; Han CP
    J Transl Med; 2009 May; 7():37. PubMed ID: 19476621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adding the p16(INK4a) marker to the traditional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel engenders no supplemental benefit in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
    Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Ruan A; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Tyan YS; Lin CY
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 19696622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracing the origin of adenocarcinomas with unknown primary using immunohistochemistry: differential diagnosis between colonic and ovarian carcinomas as primary sites.
    Lagendijk JH; Mullink H; Van Diest PJ; Meijer GA; Meijer CJ
    Hum Pathol; 1998 May; 29(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 9596273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary and secondary mucinous tumors of the ovary: analysis of coordinate immunohistochemical expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 cases.
    Vang R; Gown AM; Barry TS; Wheeler DT; Yemelyanova A; Seidman JD; Ronnett BM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16931958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.
    Dallenbach-Hellweg G; Schmidt D
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jul; 21(3):307-8. PubMed ID: 12068182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A reappraisal of three-marker (ER/Vim/CEA), four-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR), and five-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR/p16INK4a) panels in the diagnostic distinction between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
    Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Wang PH; Yue CH; Tyan YS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 May; 281(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 19847454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. True cytokeratin 8/18 immunohistochemistry is of no use in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
    Hsu JD; Yao CC; Lee MY; Kok LF; Wang PH; Tyan YS; Han CP
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 May; 29(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 20407331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ancillary p16(INK4a) adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
    Yao CC; Kok LF; Lee MY; Wang PH; Wu TS; Tyan YS; Cheng YW; Kung MF; Han CP
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 19153755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis between primary and secondary intestinal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder.
    Raspollini MR; Nesi G; Baroni G; Girardi LR; Taddei GL
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2005 Dec; 13(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 16280666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma.
    McCluggage WG; Oliva E; Herrington CS; McBride H; Young RH
    Histopathology; 2003 Aug; 43(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 12877729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immunohistochemical differentiation between primary adenocarcinomas of the ovary and ovarian metastases of colonic and breast origin. Comparison between a statistical and an intuitive approach.
    Lagendijk JH; Mullink H; van Diest PJ; Meijer GA; Meijer CJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 10474521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. p16 immunoreactivity may assist in the distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.
    McCluggage WG; Jenkins D
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 12819388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.