These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11782050)
21. Practical model-based dose-finding in phase I clinical trials: methods based on toxicity. Thall PF; Lee SJ Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 12801254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies. Iasonos A; Wilton AS; Riedel ER; Seshan VE; Spriggs DR Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):465-77. PubMed ID: 18827039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Toxicity equivalence range design (TEQR): a practical Phase I design. Blanchard MS; Longmate JA Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 20923709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials. Huang B; Chappell R Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data. Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials. Paoletti X; Kramar A Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Decision-theoretic designs for dose-finding clinical trials with multiple outcomes. Fan SK; Wang YG Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(10):1699-714. PubMed ID: 16217860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities. Polley MY Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2130-43. PubMed ID: 21590790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving safety of the continual reassessment method via a modified allocation rule. Mozgunov P; Jaki T Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):906-922. PubMed ID: 31859399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Continual reassessment method with regularization in phase I clinical trials. Li X; Ivanova A; Tian H; Lim P; Liu K J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 30(6):964-978. PubMed ID: 32926652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs. Oron AP; Hoff PD Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of two phase I trial designs. Korn EL; Midthune D; Chen TT; Rubinstein LV; Christian MC; Simon RM Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(18):1799-806. PubMed ID: 7997713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A web tool for designing and conducting phase I trials using the continual reassessment method. Wages NA; Petroni GR BMC Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):133. PubMed ID: 29402249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]