82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11782077)
1. Invasive squamous-cell carcinoma in ThinPrep specimens: diagnostic clues in the cellular pattern.
Clark SB; Dawson AE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11782077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glandular lesions of the cervix on thin-layer Pap tests. Validity of cytologic criteria used in identifying significant lesions.
Ozkan F; Ramzy I; Mody DR
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):372-9. PubMed ID: 15192953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atrophic vaginitis versus invasive squamous cell carcinoma on ThinPrep cytology: can the background be reliably distinguished?
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Dec; 27(6):362-4. PubMed ID: 12451567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additional slides from residual ThinPrep Pap tests: Of potential diagnostic benefit in equivocal cases?
Grapsa D; Ioakim-Liossi A; Stergiou E; Petrakakou E; Nicolopoulou-Stamati P; Patsouris E; Athanassiadou P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Oct; 40(10):856-60. PubMed ID: 21485025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Warty (condylomatous) carcinoma of the cervix. A review of 3 cases with emphasis on thin-layer cytology and molecular analysis for HPV.
Ng WK; Cheung LK; Li AS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 12685182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in ThinPrep slides: evaluation of cases that performed poorly versus those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Cobb CJ; Lozano RL; Neal MH; Prey M; Schulte MA;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Apr; 128(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 15043450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ThinPrep and Pap smear in relation to prediction of adenocarcinoma in situ.
Roberts JM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Humcevic J; Laverty CR
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9987454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exfoliative cytology of primary poorly differentiated (small-cell) neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in ThinPrep material: a case report.
Hoerl HD; Schink J; Hartenbach E; Wagner JL; Kurtycz DF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10907925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thin-layer (liquid-based) cytologic findings of papillary squamotransitional cell carcinoma of the cervix. Review of cases over a 4-year period with emphasis on potential diagnostic pitfalls.
Ng WK
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 12685179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting invasive squamous cell carcinoma?
Johnson SJ; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2001 Jun; 12(3):144-50. PubMed ID: 11380555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphologic characteristics of p16INK4a-positive cells in cervical cytology samples.
Trunk MJ; Dallenbach-Hellweg G; Ridder R; Petry KU; Ikenberg H; Schneider V; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):771-82. PubMed ID: 15581161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologic diagnosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities.
Park IA; Lee SN; Chae SW; Park KH; Kim JW; Lee HP
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 11480713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
