BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11782077)

  • 21. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
    Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ThinPrep vs. conventional smear cytologic preparations in analyzing fine-needle aspiration specimens from palpable breast masses.
    Biscotti CV; Shorie JH; Gramlich TL; Easley KA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10425053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.
    Bur M; Knowles K; Pekow P; Corral O; Donovan J
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):631-42. PubMed ID: 7631535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cell block preparation as a diagnostic technique complementary to fluid-based monolayer cervicovaginal specimens.
    Richard K; Dziura B; Hornish A
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 9987453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer.
    Weintraub J; Morabia A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jan; 22(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10613975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Siebers AG; van der Laak JA; Huberts-Manders R; Vedder JE; Bulten J
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22708685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency of tumor diathesis in smears from women with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
    Rushing L; Cibas ES
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(3):781-5. PubMed ID: 9167702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intraepithelial neoplasia mimicking microinvasive squamous-cell carcinoma in endocervical brushings.
    Covell JL; Frierson HF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1992; 8(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 1551362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
    Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Liquid-based cytology findings of glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix. Report of a case with histologic correlation and molecular analysis.
    Ng WK; Cheung LK; Li AS
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 14969191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Schoolland M; Allpress S; Sterrett GF
    Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 11836697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cytological recognition of invasive squamous cancer of the uterine cervix: comparison of conventional light-microscopical screening and neural network-based screening.
    Kok MR; Boon ME; Schreiner-Kok PG; Koss LG
    Hum Pathol; 2000 Jan; 31(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10665908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Detection of various papilloma virus types in cytologic smears of precancerous conditions and cancers of the uterine cervix].
    Wagner D; de Villiers EM; Gissmann L
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 45(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 2989076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The determination of Papanicolaou smear adequacy using a semiquantitative method to evaluate cellularity.
    Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 1769285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
    Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
    Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reflex high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing (Hybrid Capture 2) of bloody ThinPrep specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance interpretation: does pretreatment with acetic acid affect test performance?
    Feng J; Husain M
    Cancer; 2005 Dec; 105(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 16080178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME; Kelly D
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.