185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11782091)
1. Comparison of three commonly used cytologic preparations in effusion immunocytochemistry.
Fetsch PA; Simsir A; Brosky K; Abati A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 11782091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunocytochemistry of serous effusion specimens: a comparison of ThinPrep vs cell block.
Gong Y; Sun X; Michael CW; Attal S; Williamson BA; Bedrossian CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12508174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three cytologic preparation methods and immunocytochemistries to distinguish adenocarcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion.
Ueda J; Iwata T; Ono M; Takahashi M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 16355377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Value of the EZH2 Immunomarker in Malignant Effusion Cytology.
Ang PP; Tan GC; Karim N; Wong YP
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):248-255. PubMed ID: 31352449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphologic and immunocytochemical performances of effusion cell blocks prepared using 3 different methods.
Jing X; Li QK; Bedrossian U; Michael CW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Feb; 139(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 23355202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cultured anaplastic cell lines as immunocytochemistry controls: a comparison of ThinPrep-processed smears and conventional air-dried cytospins.
Wiatrowska BA; Berner A; Torlakovic G; Emilsen E; Mykelbost GL; Torlakovic E
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Nov; 25(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 11747220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology.
Ko EC; Jhala NC; Shultz JJ; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids.
Afify A; Zhou H; Howell L; Paulino AF
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 16450901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Markers for metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusion specimens.
Shield PW; Callan JJ; Devine PL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 7532566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of immunocytochemical sensitivity between formalin-fixed and alcohol-fixed specimens reveals the diagnostic value of alcohol-fixed cytocentrifuged preparations in malignant effusion cytology.
Ikeda K; Tate G; Suzuki T; Mitsuya T
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 136(6):934-42. PubMed ID: 22095380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens].
Mao YY; Yang M; Liu DG; Lin MH; Zhang LQ; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 38(8):547-50. PubMed ID: 20021967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of cancer cells in effusions from patients diagnosed with gynaecological malignancies. Evaluation of five epithelial markers.
Davidson B; Risberg B; Kristensen G; Kvalheim G; Emilsen E; Bjåmer A; Berner A
Virchows Arch; 1999 Jul; 435(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10431845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of antibodies to HBME-1 and calretinin for the detection of mesothelial cells in effusion cytology.
Fetsch PA; Simsir A; Abati A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Sep; 25(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 11536437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GLUT1 antibody staining in thin-layer specimens of benign and malignant body cavity effusions.
Mensch LS; Weller L; Simmons-Arnold L; Gibson PC; Leiman G; Beatty B
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 12365212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cytodiagnosis and cytomorphologic analysis of hematolymphoid malignancy in serous effusion: a study of 23 cases].
He SR; Peng WX; Sun MJ; Yang L; He L; Su XL; He Q; Liu DG
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 41(10):691-5. PubMed ID: 23302312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations.
Ikeda K; Tate G; Suzuki T; Kitamura T; Mitsuya T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jun; 39(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 21574259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Special stains, the old and the new: the impact of immunocytochemistry in effusion cytology.
Bedrossian CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Feb; 18(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 9484644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. GATA3: a promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens.
Shield PW; Papadimos DJ; Walsh MD
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 122(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24421220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of adenocarcinoma in cytospin preparations of effusions using monoclonal antibody B72.3.
Martin SE; Moshiri S; Thor A; Vilasi V; Chu EW; Schlom J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jul; 86(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 3524191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
