BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11782434)

  • 1. Different Smad2 partners bind a common hydrophobic pocket in Smad2 via a defined proline-rich motif.
    Randall RA; Germain S; Inman GJ; Bates PA; Hill CS
    EMBO J; 2002 Jan; 21(1-2):145-56. PubMed ID: 11782434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of phosphorylated-Smad2-containing complexes by a novel Smad interaction motif.
    Randall RA; Howell M; Page CS; Daly A; Bates PA; Hill CS
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Feb; 24(3):1106-21. PubMed ID: 14729957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Homeodomain and winged-helix transcription factors recruit activated Smads to distinct promoter elements via a common Smad interaction motif.
    Germain S; Howell M; Esslemont GM; Hill CS
    Genes Dev; 2000 Feb; 14(4):435-51. PubMed ID: 10691736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural basis of Smad2 recognition by the Smad anchor for receptor activation.
    Wu G; Chen YG; Ozdamar B; Gyuricza CA; Chong PA; Wrana JL; Massagué J; Shi Y
    Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5450):92-7. PubMed ID: 10615055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SARA, a FYVE domain protein that recruits Smad2 to the TGFbeta receptor.
    Tsukazaki T; Chiang TA; Davison AF; Attisano L; Wrana JL
    Cell; 1998 Dec; 95(6):779-91. PubMed ID: 9865696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Xenopus Smad4beta is the co-Smad component of developmentally regulated transcription factor complexes responsible for induction of early mesodermal genes.
    Howell M; Itoh F; Pierreux CE; Valgeirsdottir S; Itoh S; ten Dijke P; Hill CS
    Dev Biol; 1999 Oct; 214(2):354-69. PubMed ID: 10525340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of zebrafish smad1, smad2 and smad5: the amino-terminus of smad1 and smad5 is required for specific function in the embryo.
    Müller F; Blader P; Rastegar S; Fischer N; Knöchel W; Strähle U
    Mech Dev; 1999 Oct; 88(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 10525190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smad2 and Smad3 positively and negatively regulate TGF beta-dependent transcription through the forkhead DNA-binding protein FAST2.
    Labbé E; Silvestri C; Hoodless PA; Wrana JL; Attisano L
    Mol Cell; 1998 Jul; 2(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 9702197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Swift is a novel BRCT domain coactivator of Smad2 in transforming growth factor beta signaling.
    Shimizu K; Bourillot PY; Nielsen SJ; Zorn AM; Gurdon JB
    Mol Cell Biol; 2001 Jun; 21(12):3901-12. PubMed ID: 11359898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Smad4 activation domain (SAD) is a proline-rich, p300-dependent transcriptional activation domain.
    de Caestecker MP; Yahata T; Wang D; Parks WT; Huang S; Hill CS; Shioda T; Roberts AB; Lechleider RJ
    J Biol Chem; 2000 Jan; 275(3):2115-22. PubMed ID: 10636916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smad4 and FAST-1 in the assembly of activin-responsive factor.
    Chen X; Weisberg E; Fridmacher V; Watanabe M; Naco G; Whitman M
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6646):85-9. PubMed ID: 9288972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of FAST-1 and Smads in transcriptional regulation by activin during early Xenopus embryogenesis.
    Yeo CY; Chen X; Whitman M
    J Biol Chem; 1999 Sep; 274(37):26584-90. PubMed ID: 10473623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cloning and characterization of zebrafish smad2, smad3 and smad4.
    Dick A; Mayr T; Bauer H; Meier A; Hammerschmidt M
    Gene; 2000 Apr; 246(1-2):69-80. PubMed ID: 10767528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular and functional consequences of Smad4 C-terminal missense mutations in colorectal tumour cells.
    De Bosscher K; Hill CS; Nicolás FJ
    Biochem J; 2004 Apr; 379(Pt 1):209-16. PubMed ID: 14715079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TLP, a novel modulator of TGF-beta signaling, has opposite effects on Smad2- and Smad3-dependent signaling.
    Felici A; Wurthner JU; Parks WT; Giam LR; Reiss M; Karpova TS; McNally JG; Roberts AB
    EMBO J; 2003 Sep; 22(17):4465-77. PubMed ID: 12941698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual role of the Smad4/DPC4 tumor suppressor in TGFbeta-inducible transcriptional complexes.
    Liu F; Pouponnot C; Massagué J
    Genes Dev; 1997 Dec; 11(23):3157-67. PubMed ID: 9389648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel Xenopus Smad-interacting forkhead transcription factor (XFast-3) cooperates with XFast-1 in regulating gastrulation movements.
    Howell M; Inman GJ; Hill CS
    Development; 2002 Jun; 129(12):2823-34. PubMed ID: 12050132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A short amino-acid sequence in MH1 domain is responsible for functional differences between Smad2 and Smad3.
    Dennler S; Huet S; Gauthier JM
    Oncogene; 1999 Feb; 18(8):1643-8. PubMed ID: 10102636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disorder in a target for the smad2 mad homology 2 domain and its implications for binding and specificity.
    Chong PA; Ozdamar B; Wrana JL; Forman-Kay JD
    J Biol Chem; 2004 Sep; 279(39):40707-14. PubMed ID: 15231848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4 cooperate with Sp1 to induce p15(Ink4B) transcription in response to TGF-beta.
    Feng XH; Lin X; Derynck R
    EMBO J; 2000 Oct; 19(19):5178-93. PubMed ID: 11013220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.