144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11783552)
1. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
Becker G
Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
Becker G
Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
Slaney KL; Maraun MD
Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.
Raudenbush SW; Xiao-Feng L
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 11778679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
Collins LM; Schafer JL; Kam CM
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):330-51. PubMed ID: 11778676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.
Lunneborg CE
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
Magis D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New approaches to missing data in psychological research: introduction to the special section.
West SG
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 11778674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
Raykov T; Penev S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items.
Rae G
Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17563171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
Tryon WW
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model selection for minimum-diameter partitioning.
Brusco MJ; Steinley D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):471-95. PubMed ID: 24192201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
Baldwin P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
Ranger J; Kuhn JT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L
Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
