These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11783569)

  • 1. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items.
    Rae G
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An improved Hochberg procedure for multiple tests of significance.
    Rom DM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 23330866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
    Baldwin P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How important is transient error in estimating reliability? Going beyond simulation studies.
    Becker G
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Sep; 5(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 11004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 Nov; 54(Pt 2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11817096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
    Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Nursing Student Self-Efficacy Scale: development using item response theory.
    Stump GS; Husman J; Brem SK
    Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 22551989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good test--retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities.
    Hughes C; Adlam A; Happé F; Jackson J; Taylor A; Caspi A
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2000 May; 41(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10836678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
    McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L
    Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges and strategies of instrument translation.
    Wang WL; Lee HL; Fetzer SJ
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 16585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proportion of general factor variance in a hierarchical multiple-component measuring instrument: a note on a confidence interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T; Zinbarg RE
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):193-207. PubMed ID: 21492128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.