These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1178436)

  • 1. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Jaeger T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion.
    Pressey AW; Di Lollo V; Tait RW
    Perception; 1977; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Length judgments in modified Mueller-Lyer figures.
    Predebon J
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 7235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA
    Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions: common effects.
    Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR
    Perception; 1985; 14(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 3834386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Davies TN; Spencer J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P
    Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New depth to the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Glennerster A; Rogers BJ
    Perception; 1993; 22(6):691-704. PubMed ID: 8255699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual size analysers and Mueller-Lyer illusions.
    Bonciocat C; Jemna M; Petrescu L
    Physiologie; 1983; 20(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6417697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inappropriate constancy scaling as a factor in the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Morrison LC
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Feb; 68(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 851698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Length illusions in conventional and single-wing Müller-Lyer stimuli.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1086-98. PubMed ID: 10997051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Altering Mueller-Lyer illusion magnitude using figural additions at the wing-shaft intersections.
    Searleman A; Porac C; Dafoe C; Hetzel B
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(4):619-37. PubMed ID: 16402749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are size illusions in simple line drawings affected by shading?
    Zanker JM; Abdullah AA
    Perception; 2004; 33(12):1475-82. PubMed ID: 15729914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of chromaticities and occlusion of shaft on magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Miyahara E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Feb; 102(1):259-64. PubMed ID: 16671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 1408641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations.
    Nemati F
    Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The many illusions of the Müller-Lyer: comparisons of the wings-in and wings-out illusions and manipulations of standard and dot forms.
    Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR
    Perception; 1981; 10(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 7279543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the angle components in the wings-in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):773-81. PubMed ID: 8923548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Reversed' illusion with three-dimensional Müller-Lyer shapes.
    Nijhawan R
    Perception; 1995; 24(11):1281-96. PubMed ID: 8643333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.