555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11784765)
1. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
Bierer JA; Nye AD
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
Snyder RL; Middlebrooks JC; Bonham BH
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.
Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 1(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 11545227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants.
George SS; Shivdasani MN; Wise AK; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066005. PubMed ID: 26401834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
Bierer JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness.
Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
J Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 82(6):3506-26. PubMed ID: 10601478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
Pfingst BE; Xu L
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
Snyder RL; Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
