These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. The probable origin and purpose of the superficial reflex, known as the sign of babinski. FAY T Confin Neurol; 1955; 15(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 14390937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A precursor to the Babinski sign. Haddad FS Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 Jan; 150(1):91. PubMed ID: 18214392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [The extension of the area of reflexogenic Babinski sign, study and clinical interpretation - first report]. GAUTHIER CA Laval Med; 1952 Mar; 17(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 14939939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Miller TM; Johnston SC Neurology; 2005 Oct; 65(8):1165-8. PubMed ID: 16247040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Diagnostic value of Babinski and Rossolimo signs in small children with nervous system damage]. Tylicka T Pediatr Pol; 1967 Aug; 42(8):935-42. PubMed ID: 6059046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Babinski sign. Reliability of new technology must be alarmingly low. Hughes T BMJ; 1997 Feb; 314(7077):374. PubMed ID: 9040354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Absence of Babinski sign in certain spasmodic paraplegias; causes and consequences]. GROSSIORD A; KAHN MF Rev Neurol (Paris); 1957 Apr; 96(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 13466762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Images in clinical medicine. The Babinski sign. Neelon FA; Harvey EN N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(3):196. PubMed ID: 9895399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Contribution to the study of the Babinski sign]. TCHEHRAZI E Acta Med Iran; 1957 Apr; 1(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 13469217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Ronthal M Neurology; 2006 May; 66(10):1607-9; author reply 1607-9. PubMed ID: 16721957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Khatri BO Neurology; 2006 May; 66(10):1607-9; author reply 1607-9. PubMed ID: 16721958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? van Gijn J Neurology; 2006 May; 66(10):1607-9; author reply 1607-9. PubMed ID: 16717239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Babinski sign]. PLICHET A Presse Med (1893); 1954 Sep; 62(60):1228. PubMed ID: 13215336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Bogousslavsky J Neurology; 2006 May; 66(10):1607-9; author reply 1607-9. PubMed ID: 16721961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The extensor plantar response in neonates is not the same as the Babinski sign. Landau WM Pediatr Neurol; 2005 Sep; 33(3):223. PubMed ID: 16139742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Babinski's clinical differentiation of organic paralysis from hysterical paralysis: effect on US neurology. Okun MS; Koehler PJ Arch Neurol; 2004 May; 61(5):778-83. PubMed ID: 15148160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The extensor plantar response in neonates is not the same as the Babinski sign. Ng YT; Bodensteiner JB Pediatr Neurol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):218; author reply 218-9. PubMed ID: 15730909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Brenner SR Neurology; 2006 May; 66(10):1607-9; author reply 1607-9. PubMed ID: 16721962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]