These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11785354)

  • 41. ACOG releases report on prevention of D isoimmunization.
    Am Fam Physician; 1991 Jan; 43(1):307-8, 310. PubMed ID: 1846056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Economic analysis of the prevention of anti-D immunization].
    Ravinet J; Carbonne B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S104-1S111. PubMed ID: 16495835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Is it always necessary to give anti-D gamma-globulins in the case of spontaneous miscarriage in Rhesus-negative patients?].
    Salvat J; Slamani L; Capilna M; Brescu O
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Apr; 25(4):V-IX. PubMed ID: 9229512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Weak D (Du) phenotype and pregnancy].
    Stefanova A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 15853015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fetal RhD genotyping: a more efficient use of anti-D immunoglobulin.
    Daniels G; Finning K; Martin P; Summers J
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):568-71. PubMed ID: 18436463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Recommendations for clinical practice. Prevention in maternofetal Rh immunization (December 2005)].
    Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 16644259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis--is the protection adequate?
    Davies J; Chant R; Simpson S; Powell R
    Transfus Med; 2011 Dec; 21(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 21906191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. More on Rhogam.
    Keutzer B
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):68-9; author reply 69. PubMed ID: 11984911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The continuing burden of Rh disease 50 years after the introduction of anti-Rh(D) immunoglobin prophylaxis: call to action.
    Visser GHA; Di Renzo GC; Spitalnik SL;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):227.e1-227.e4. PubMed ID: 31121145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Rhogam: do midwives hold the evidence?
    Wickham S
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1998; (46):34-5. PubMed ID: 10338629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Clinical guidelines on anti-D prophylaxis: hasty critics?].
    Carbonne B; Marpeau L; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Oct; 36(6):526-8. PubMed ID: 17893030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Isoimmunization in pregnancy.
    Shaver SM
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2004 Jun; 16(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 15145363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.
    BMJ; 1989 Oct; 299(6704):919-20. PubMed ID: 2555002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Guidelines for antenatal anti-D prophylaxis.
    Mason G; Glanville T
    Lancet; 2002 Sep; 360(9336):880. PubMed ID: 12243957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Text of the guidelines for prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization].
    College National de Gynecolegues et Obstetriciens Francais
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S131-1S135. PubMed ID: 16495839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The global burden of Rh disease.
    Zipursky A; Paul VK
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 Mar; 96(2):F84-5. PubMed ID: 21037283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Haemolytic disease of the newborn: the new NICE guidelines.
    Thompson J
    J Fam Health Care; 2002; 12(5):133-6. PubMed ID: 12449064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Antepartum prophylaxis: the final step in the Rh isoimmunization problem?].
    Brandes J; Fisher M
    Harefuah; 1989 Nov; 117(10):340-1. PubMed ID: 2559005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Saramago P; Yang H; Llewellyn A; Palmer S; Simmonds M; Griffin S
    BJOG; 2018 Oct; 125(11):1414-1422. PubMed ID: 29415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Alloimmunization in pregnancy during the years 1992-2005 in the central west region of Sweden.
    Gottvall T; Filbey D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 18704776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.