These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11785817)

  • 1. Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3163-8. PubMed ID: 11785817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):386-95. PubMed ID: 12880050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
    Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear toughening, protection, and potentiation of noise-induced trauma by non-Gaussian noise.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):969-76. PubMed ID: 12597190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2245-54. PubMed ID: 17902860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The kurtosis metric as an adjunct to energy in the prediction of trauma from continuous, nonGaussian noise exposures.
    Qiu W; Hamernik RP; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3901-6. PubMed ID: 17225417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of a kurtosis metric in estimating the hazard to hearing of complex industrial noise exposures.
    Qiu W; Hamernik RP; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2856-66. PubMed ID: 23654391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures.
    Lei SF; Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1435-44. PubMed ID: 7963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Qiu W; Davis B; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1613-20. PubMed ID: 17407898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate.
    Henderson D; Subramaniam M; Gratton MA; Saunders SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1350-7. PubMed ID: 2030222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex noise exposures: an energy analysis.
    Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):997-1006. PubMed ID: 8445135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiometric and histological differences between the effects of continuous and impulsive noise exposures.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD; Lei SF; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2088-95. PubMed ID: 8473621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Interaction between continuous and impulse noise: anatomic and functional evaluation in relation to the intensity of the exposure].
    Roberto M; Zito F; Hamernik R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1992; 12(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 1303009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duration and peak level as co-factors in hearing loss from exposure to impact noise.
    Levine S; Hofstetter P; Zheng XY; Henderson D
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():27-36. PubMed ID: 9505295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise and salicylate on auditory evoked-response thresholds in the chinchilla.
    Bancroft BR; Boettcher FA; Salvi RJ; Wu J
    Hear Res; 1991 Jul; 54(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1917714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound-induced priming of the chinchilla auditory system.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA
    Hear Res; 1999 Nov; 137(1-2):127-36. PubMed ID: 10545640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure.
    Dunn DE; Davis RR; Merry CJ; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1979-85. PubMed ID: 1669963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.
    Zhao YM; Qiu W; Zeng L; Chen SS; Cheng XR; Davis RI; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 20588120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of auditory-evoked potentials and behavioral thresholds in the normal and noise-exposed chinchilla.
    Henderson D; Hamernik RP; Salvi RJ; Ahroon WA
    Audiology; 1983; 22(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 6847532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact noise and the equal energy hypothesis.
    Roberto M; Hamernik RP; Salvi RJ; Henderson D; Milone R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1514-20. PubMed ID: 3989106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.