BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11785901)

  • 1. Efficacy comparisons of disinfectants used by the commercial poultry industry.
    Ruano M; El-Attrache J; Villegas P
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 11785901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses on surfaces compared with other micro-organisms and impact of suboptimal disinfectant exposure.
    Howie R; Alfa MJ; Coombs K
    J Hosp Infect; 2008 Aug; 69(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 18602193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.
    Yilmaz A; Kaleta EF
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009 May; 116(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 19462641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodologic problems in the bacteriological laboratory testing of disinfectants for surface disinfection in veterinary medicine].
    Kleiner U; Trenner P
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1988 May; 186(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 3138832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary study on the efficacy and safety of eight individual and blended disinfectants against poultry and dairy indicator organisms.
    Kassaify ZG; El Hakim RG; Rayya EG; Shaib HA; Barbour EK
    Vet Ital; 2007; 43(4):821-30. PubMed ID: 20422561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a new alginate film test to study the bactericidal efficacy of the high-level disinfectant ortho-phthalaldehyde.
    Shackelford JC; Hanlon GW; Maillard JY
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Feb; 57(2):335-8. PubMed ID: 16332730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.
    Augustin M; Ali-Vehmas T; Atroshi F
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15144735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Virus resistance in a hospital environment: overview of the virucide activity of disinfectants used in liquid form].
    Soule H; Duc DL; Mallaret MR; Chanzy B; Charvier A; Gratacap-Cavallier B; Morand P; Seigneurin JM
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1998; 56(6):693-703. PubMed ID: 9853028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluating the effect of quaternary ammonium disinfectants on bacterial strains of animal origin].
    Rueda J; Amigot Lázaro JA; Ducha J
    Rev Sci Tech; 2003 Dec; 22(3):1097-104. PubMed ID: 15005566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Virucidal effectiveness of some commercial products for chemothermal disinfection methods for temperature resistant viruses and bacteriophages--evaluation of a test model].
    von Rheinbaben F; Bansemir KP; Heinzel M
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Feb; 192(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 1313238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of disinfectants against biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Takeo Y; Oie S; Kamiya A; Konishi H; Nakazawa T
    Microbios; 1994; 79(318):19-26. PubMed ID: 8078416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quantitative recovery of bacteria from different germ carrier materials].
    Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 2118354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disinfection of fabrics and carpets artificially contaminated with calicivirus: relevance in institutional and healthcare centres.
    Malik YS; Allwood PB; Hedberg CW; Goyal SM
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Jun; 63(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 16600432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Efficacy of 8 disinfectants on 3 types of surfaces contaminated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa].
    Gélinas P; Goulet J
    Can J Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 29(12):1715-30. PubMed ID: 6424918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virucidal efficacy of nine commercial disinfectants against porcine circovirus type 2.
    Martin H; Le Potier MF; Maris P
    Vet J; 2008 Sep; 177(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 17851101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Virucidal efficacy of eight disinfectants against pneumovirus, coronavirus and parvovirus].
    Maris P
    Ann Rech Vet; 1990; 21(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 2288453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of disinfectants commonly used by the commercial poultry industry under simulated field conditions.
    Stringfellow K; Anderson P; Caldwell D; Lee J; Byrd J; McReynolds J; Carey J; Nisbet D; Farnell M
    Poult Sci; 2009 Jun; 88(6):1151-5. PubMed ID: 19439623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Trends in the evaluation of chemical disinfectants as virucides].
    Weinhold E
    Tierarztl Prax; 1973; 1(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 4807583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bioactive effectiveness of selected disinfective agents on Gram-negative bacilli isolated from hospital environment].
    Pancer KW; Laudy AE; Mikulak E; Gliniewicz A; Staniszewska M; Stypułkowska-Misiurewicz H
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2004; 58(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 15810507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1.
    Gutiérrez CB; Rodríguez Barbosa JI; Suárez J; González OR; Tascón RI; Rodríguez Ferri EF
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Aug; 56(8):1025-9. PubMed ID: 8533973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.