These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of skin, SMAS, and composite flaps as they pertain to rhytidectomy. Saulis AS; Lautenschlager EP; Mustoe TA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):590-8; discussion 599-600. PubMed ID: 12142682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Kamer FM; Frankel AS Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):878-81. PubMed ID: 9727459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Technique Using the Suction-Assisted Endoscope Sheath to Transfer SMAS for Lip Augmentation. Shank N; Tan P; Khoobehi K Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Sep; 37(8):NP90-NP93. PubMed ID: 28586415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-year study of the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift with minimal skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection: a durable, natural-appearing lift with less surgery and recovery time. Finger ER Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1273-83; discussion 1284. PubMed ID: 11373573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lip augmentation using sternocleidomastoid muscle and fascia grafts. Agarwal A; Gracely E; Maloney RW Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 20231589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejuvenation of the nasolabial complex with inverted triangular-shaped SMAS grafts. Cintra HL; Landecker A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12925858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system in face lift. de Castro CC Ann Plast Surg; 1986 Apr; 16(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 3273045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new ePTFE soft tissue implant for natural-looking augmentation of lips and wrinkles. Hanke CW Dermatol Surg; 2002 Oct; 28(10):901-8. PubMed ID: 12410673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study. Becker FF; Bassichis BA Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2004; 6(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 14732637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three sublayers in the SMAS: Observations of facial soft tissue using the stretched tissue dissection method focusing on the SMAS. Watanabe K; Han A; Inoue E; Iwanaga J; Kikuchi K; Haikata Y; Nooma K; Harano T; Tabira Y; Saga T Clin Anat; 2023 Jan; 36(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 36181309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The viscoelastic properties of the SMAS and its clinical translation: firm support for the high-SMAS rhytidectomy. Trussler AP; Hatef D; Broussard GB; Brown S; Barton FE Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 128(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 21572376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subperiosteal face lift: a 200-case, 4-year review. Heinrichs HL; Kaidi AA Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):843-55. PubMed ID: 9727455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]