These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11786832)

  • 1. Lip augmentation with superficial musculoaponeurotic system grafts: report of 103 cases.
    Leaf N; Firouz JS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):319-26; discussion 327-8. PubMed ID: 11786832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term Analysis of Lip Augmentation With Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Tissue Transfer Following Biplanar Extended SMAS Rhytidectomy.
    Richardson MA; Rousso DE; Replogle WH
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jan; 19(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27684045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of lip enhancement using autologous superficial musculoaponeurotic system tissue and postauricular fascia in conjunction with lip advancement.
    Recupero WD; McCollough EG
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 20855778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upper-lip augmentation by graft of preseptal orbicularis oculi muscle through blepharoplasty.
    Tarallo M; Monarca C; Rizzo MI; Scuderi N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 34(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 19554365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuances in Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Rhytidectomy.
    Rousso DE; Adams AS
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Aug; 28(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 32503715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy.
    Rousso DE; Rutherford KD
    Facial Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 30(4):380-93. PubMed ID: 25076446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of skin, SMAS, and composite flaps as they pertain to rhytidectomy.
    Saulis AS; Lautenschlager EP; Mustoe TA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):590-8; discussion 599-600. PubMed ID: 12142682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison.
    Kamer FM; Frankel AS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):878-81. PubMed ID: 9727459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Technique Using the Suction-Assisted Endoscope Sheath to Transfer SMAS for Lip Augmentation.
    Shank N; Tan P; Khoobehi K
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Sep; 37(8):NP90-NP93. PubMed ID: 28586415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 5-year study of the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift with minimal skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection: a durable, natural-appearing lift with less surgery and recovery time.
    Finger ER
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1273-83; discussion 1284. PubMed ID: 11373573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lip augmentation using sternocleidomastoid muscle and fascia grafts.
    Agarwal A; Gracely E; Maloney RW
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 20231589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejuvenation of the nasolabial complex with inverted triangular-shaped SMAS grafts.
    Cintra HL; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12925858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system in face lift.
    de Castro CC
    Ann Plast Surg; 1986 Apr; 16(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 3273045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new ePTFE soft tissue implant for natural-looking augmentation of lips and wrinkles.
    Hanke CW
    Dermatol Surg; 2002 Oct; 28(10):901-8. PubMed ID: 12410673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study.
    Becker FF; Bassichis BA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2004; 6(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 14732637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three sublayers in the SMAS: Observations of facial soft tissue using the stretched tissue dissection method focusing on the SMAS.
    Watanabe K; Han A; Inoue E; Iwanaga J; Kikuchi K; Haikata Y; Nooma K; Harano T; Tabira Y; Saga T
    Clin Anat; 2023 Jan; 36(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 36181309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The viscoelastic properties of the SMAS and its clinical translation: firm support for the high-SMAS rhytidectomy.
    Trussler AP; Hatef D; Broussard GB; Brown S; Barton FE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 128(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 21572376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subperiosteal face lift: a 200-case, 4-year review.
    Heinrichs HL; Kaidi AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):843-55. PubMed ID: 9727455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopically assisted limited-incision rhytidectomy: a 10-year prospective study.
    Citarella ER; Sterodimas A; Condé-Green A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 19962950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasolabial fold augmentation with SMAS graft.
    Stenekes MW; Van Der Lei B
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1618-21. PubMed ID: 22954593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.