These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11786873)

  • 1. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 12695766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.
    Rakhshan V; Ghorbanyjavadpour F
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 30941649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric Soft Tissue Standard and Gender Dimorphism in Nasal Prominence estimated By Holdaway's Analysis in Patients visiting College of Dentistry, Aljouf University.
    Kundi I
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 28174370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue norms: Conventional and based on true vertical in a Lebanese population.
    El Hayeck E; Bassil-Nassif N; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Sep; 14(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 27520715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The beauty perspective of the horizontal lip position].
    Hsu BS; Kuang SH
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Mar; 9(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 2131158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of parental data to evaluate soft tissues in an Anatolian Turkish population according to Holdaway soft tissue norms.
    Gelgör IE; Karaman AI; Zekiç E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e1-9. PubMed ID: 16527625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of extraction treatment on Holdaway soft-tissue measurements.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15132442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.