These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11786874)

  • 1. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 12695766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal profile changes in an Anatolian Turkish population.
    Hamamci N; Arslan SG; Sahin S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 19748924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles.
    Lew KK; Ho KK; Keng SB; Ho KH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov; 50(11):1184-9; discussion 1189-90. PubMed ID: 1403274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men.
    Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Saito I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):576.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18005826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posteroanterior cephalometric norms in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Sari Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 15775947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Matoula S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue norms: Conventional and based on true vertical in a Lebanese population.
    El Hayeck E; Bassil-Nassif N; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Sep; 14(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 27520715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.
    Rakhshan V; Ghorbanyjavadpour F
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 30941649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric characteristics of postorthodontic female patients with attractive and unattractive frontal posed smiles.
    Kawashima Y; Kure K; Arai K
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):797-805. PubMed ID: 29911910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.