These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11786874)

  • 21. Heritability of facial proportions and soft-tissue profile characteristics in Turkish Anatolian siblings.
    Baydaş B; Erdem A; Yavuz I; Ceylan I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 17418717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population.
    Sushner NI
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 72(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 269666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile.
    Khosravanifard B; Rakhshan V; Raeesi E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses.
    Bishara SE; Hession TJ; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 3862344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ricketts' E-line profile preferences among Nigerian orthodontists, orthodontic trainees, and a young undergraduate students' population.
    Otuyemi O; Afolabi D; Oyewole T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 35439916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of soft tissue cephalometric norms between Turkish and European-American adults.
    Celebi AA; Tan E; Gelgor IE; Colak T; Ayyildiz E
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():806203. PubMed ID: 23533362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A study on craniofacial morphology of Japanese subjects with normal occlusion and esthetic profile.
    Nakahara C; Nakahara R
    Odontology; 2007 Jul; 95(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 17660981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive Italian women.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):282-93. PubMed ID: 18030374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study.
    Hashim HA; AlBarakati SF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 May; 4(2):60-73. PubMed ID: 12761590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between craniofacial structures and the nose in Anatolian Turkish adults: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Gulsen A; Okay C; Aslan BI; Uner O; Yavuzer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e15-25. PubMed ID: 16905054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces.
    Amini F; Razavian ZS; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A; Sigler LM; McNamara JA
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 21273287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.