184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11787076)
1. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
Cynkier PN
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The individualizing function of forensic multidisciplinary assessment in a Dutch residential setting: the Pieter Baan Centre experience.
Koenraadt F
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 1587654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the Need for Hospitalization in Order to Conduct a Psychiatric Evaluation as part of Criminal Law Procedure.
Olmer A; Greenberg B; Strous RD
Isr Med Assoc J; 2015 Sep; 17(9):533-7. PubMed ID: 26625540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond Dusky and Godinez: competency before and after trial.
Perlin ML
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 12808692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
Scott CL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Closing forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy: a new deal for mental health care?].
Casacchia M; Malavolta M; Bianchini V; Giusti L; Di Michele V; Giosuè P; Ruggeri M; Biondi M; Roncone R;
Riv Psichiatr; 2015; 50(5):199-209. PubMed ID: 26489069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of repeated forensic evaluations of legal sanity.
Kacperska I; Heitzman J; Bąk T; Leśko AW; Opio M
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():24-9. PubMed ID: 26346685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of legal reforms on length of forensic assessments in Alberta, Canada.
Stuart H; Arboleda-Flórez J; Crisanti AS
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2001; 24(4-5):527-38. PubMed ID: 11521424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
Schreiber HL
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
