These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11787134)

  • 1. [When is screening economically beneficial?].
    Sintonen H
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(8):902-8. PubMed ID: 11787134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valuing cost in cost utility analysis of screening programme.
    Vanagas G
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):210; author reply 210. PubMed ID: 15563777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of genotyping in inherited arrhythmia syndromes: are we getting value for the money?
    Wilde AA; Pinto YM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Feb; 2(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19808437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.
    Tu KL; Palimar P; Sen S; Mathew P; Khaleeli A
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14707956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for colorectal cancer using faecal blood testing: varying the positive cut-off value.
    Edwards JB
    Pathology; 2005 Dec; 37(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16373240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for HIV antibody in serum pools.
    Bull World Health Organ; 1992; 70(2):277, 281. PubMed ID: 1600588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice.
    Austin RM
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is screening for depression worthwhile?
    Wilson I
    Aust Fam Physician; 2001 May; 30(5):417-8. PubMed ID: 11432010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Colorectal cancer screening is profitable].
    Pikkarainen P
    Duodecim; 1999; 115(17):1813-4. PubMed ID: 11941648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of three stool tests for colorectal cancer screening.
    Greenwald B
    Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Oct; 14(5):292-9; quiz 300. PubMed ID: 16318108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and cost-benefit of pooled versus singleton screening blood donations for anti-HIV: impact on different blood bank set-ups.
    Novack L; Pliskin JS; Shinar E; Safi J; Sarov B
    Trop Doct; 2006 Oct; 36(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 17034705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Winn S; Morini S
    Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 18302080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for colorectal cancer.
    Saliangas K
    Tech Coloproctol; 2004 Nov; 8 Suppl 1():s10-3. PubMed ID: 15655587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems associated with screening for asymptomatic cardiac transplant rejection.
    Dev S; Lloyd-Jones DM
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 Nov; 26(11):1219; author reply 1219-20. PubMed ID: 18022094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for tuberculosis screening before kindergarten entry.
    Flaherman VJ; Porco TC; Marseille E; Royce SE
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jul; 120(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 17606566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Gonorrhea among females in private sector care.
    Bernstein KT; Mehta SD; Rompalo AM; Erbelding EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 16582117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct-to-patient BRCA1 testing: the Twoj Styl experience.
    Gronwald J; Huzarski T; Byrski T; Debniak T; Metcalfe K; Narod SA; Lubiński J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 16807675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical, deontologic, social, and economic reflections on screening with helical CT. Part I: general aspects.
    Catalano O; Siani A; Tamburrini O
    Radiol Med; 2004 Oct; 108(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 15525884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the genetic screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia in The Netherlands.
    Wonderling D; Umans-Eckenhausen MA; Marks D; Defesche JC; Kastelein JJ; Thorogood M
    Semin Vasc Med; 2004 Feb; 4(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 15199439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should female relatives of factor V Leiden carriers be screened prior to oral contraceptive use? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Smith KJ; Monsef BS; Ragni MV
    Thromb Haemost; 2008 Sep; 100(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 18766261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.