These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data. Nicholson JK Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Does the Scientific Committee have power to suppress scientific misconduct?]. Josephson S Lakartidningen; 2003 Oct; 100(42):3350-1. PubMed ID: 14619052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith. Freshwater D J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethics in publishing; are we practising to the highest possible standards? Hunter JM Br J Anaesth; 2000 Sep; 85(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 11103170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The dark side of scientific research. McDonald JC Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud. Dayton L Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [When the editor makes an error]. Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]