These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11788042)

  • 1. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S; Arnqvist G; Friberg U
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):531-9. PubMed ID: 11296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sexual selection continuum.
    Kokko H; Brooks R; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1498):1331-40. PubMed ID: 12079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected.
    Hall DW; Kirkpatrick M; West B
    Evolution; 2000 Dec; 54(6):1862-9. PubMed ID: 11209766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
    Kokko H; Johnstone RA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice.
    Howard RS; Lively CM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():48. PubMed ID: 15555062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES.
    Kirkpatrick M
    Evolution; 1996 Dec; 50(6):2125-2140. PubMed ID: 28565675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.