These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11788042)

  • 21. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males?
    Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.
    Blows MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jun; 269(1496):1113-8. PubMed ID: 12061953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays.
    Coleman SW; Patricelli GL; Borgia G
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):742-5. PubMed ID: 15085130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition.
    Johnstone RA
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):172-5. PubMed ID: 7969449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.
    Schluter D; Price T
    Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Jul; 253(1336):117-22. PubMed ID: 8396772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates?
    Robson TE; Goldizen AW; Green DJ
    Biol Lett; 2005 Sep; 1(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 17148183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variation in the strength of male mate choice allows long-term coexistence of sperm-dependent asexuals and their sexual hosts.
    Mee JA; Otto SP
    Evolution; 2010 Oct; 64(10):2808-19. PubMed ID: 20550576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
    Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition-dependent mate choice.
    Veen T; Otto SP
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1804-15. PubMed ID: 26189918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experience matters: females use smell to select experienced males for paternal care.
    Fletcher N; Storey EJ; Johnson M; Reish DJ; Hardege JD
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7672. PubMed ID: 19888341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.