These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11788927)
1. Transfusion medicine technology transfer: traps to avoid. Mendes P Transfus Med Rev; 2002 Jan; 16(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11788927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Faculty and employee ownership of inventions in Australia. McBratney A; Tarr JA Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):1019-22. PubMed ID: 20944586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Know your intellectual property rights. Khan A Med Device Technol; 1999 Mar; 10(2):40-6. PubMed ID: 10387614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries. Andanda PA J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18316458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patent and license pearls and pitfalls for taking an idea to the marketplace. Mukharji I J Investig Med; 2011 Jun; 59(5):758-61. PubMed ID: 21441827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whose body is it anyway? Human cells and the strange effects of property and intellectual property law. Feldman R Stanford Law Rev; 2011 Jun; 63(6):1377-402. PubMed ID: 21774193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotechnology as an intellectual property. Adler RG Science; 1984 Apr; 224(4647):357-63. PubMed ID: 6584975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing genetic material to protect intellectual property rights. Jong SC; Cypess RH J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 1998 Feb; 20(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 9611821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigating intellectual property (IP): A comparative analysis of Australian universities' IP policies. Jamali HR PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304647. PubMed ID: 38814965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Protection of ideas and research results]. Musoles S Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Dec; 139(15):688-93. PubMed ID: 23103109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Material transfer agreements: open science vs. proprietary claims. Rodriguez V Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):489-91. PubMed ID: 15815676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intellectual property: patents and transfer agreements preceding clinical trials and commercialization. Ross TP Retina; 2005 Dec; 25(8 Suppl):S91-S94. PubMed ID: 16374360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intellectual property. University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act. Thursby JG; Thursby MC Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5636):1052. PubMed ID: 12933996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovation and intellectual property rights in systems biology. Allarakhia M; Wensley A Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):1485-8. PubMed ID: 16333286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. China steps up US biotech intellectual property land grab. Ratner M Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 18259157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transgenic crops, biotechnology and ownership rights: what scientists need to know. Kowalski SP; Ebora RV; Kryder RD; Potter RH Plant J; 2002 Aug; 31(4):407-21. PubMed ID: 12182700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe. Fleck B; Baldock C Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act. Kesselheim AS; Rajkumar R N Engl J Med; 2011 Sep; 365(13):1167-9. PubMed ID: 21879888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]