These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11788983)

  • 1. The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain.
    Hollingworth W; Deyo RA; Sullivan SD; Emerson SS; Gray DT; Jarvik JG
    Health Econ; 2002 Jan; 11(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 11788983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores from the SF-36 in lung transplant patients.
    Lobo FS; Gross CR; Matthees BJ
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 15085910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
    Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments.
    Suarez-Almazor ME; Kendall C; Johnson JA; Skeith K; Vincent D
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2000 Jul; 39(7):783-90. PubMed ID: 10908699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?
    Pickard AS; Wang Z; Walton SM; Lee TA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Mar; 3():11. PubMed ID: 15748287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient and public preferences for health states associated with AMD.
    Butt T; Dunbar HM; Morris S; Orr S; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 23811607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of directly elicited preferences to preferences derived from the SF-36 in adults with asthma.
    Lee TA; Hollingworth W; Sullivan SD
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 12926582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.
    Chapman JR; Norvell DC; Hermsmeyer JT; Bransford RJ; DeVine J; McGirt MJ; Lee MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. PubMed ID: 21952190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping the SF-12 to the HUI3 and VAS in a managed care population.
    Sengupta N; Nichol MB; Wu J; Globe D
    Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):927-37. PubMed ID: 15319619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
    Oldridge N; Furlong W; Perkins A; Feeny D; Torrance GW
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 15(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 18800005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the SF-6D index in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Gonçalves Campolina A; Bruscato Bortoluzzo A; Bosi Ferraz M; Mesquita Ciconelli R
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2009; 27(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 19473563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A preference-based index for the SF-12.
    Stratmann-Schoene D; Kuehn T; Kreienberg R; Leidl R
    Health Econ; 2006 Jun; 15(6):553-64. PubMed ID: 16389653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.
    Brazier J; Roberts J; Deverill M
    J Health Econ; 2002 Mar; 21(2):271-92. PubMed ID: 11939242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
    Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive impairment and preferences for current health.
    King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 19134191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.