These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11789507)

  • 1. The future of informed consent in British common law.
    Earle M
    Eur J Health Law; 1999 Sep; 6(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 11789507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' rights--why the Australian courts have rejected 'Bolam'.
    Kirby M
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Feb; 21(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 7776350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditions for judicial emergence of the doctrine of informed consent: an American-Australian comparison.
    Thomson CJ
    Med Law; 1988 Jan; 7(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3277001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Informed consent'--variations on a familiar theme.
    Burchell J
    Med Law; 1986; 5(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 3784790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent--legal and ethical aspects: a review of the case law.
    Bal A
    Issues Med Ethics; 1999; 7(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 16323324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common-law principles in consent for patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery who lack mental capacity: do we know them all?
    Shekar V; Jabbar J; Mitchell DA; Brennan PA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 53(9):805-8. PubMed ID: 26320754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vindicating the patient's rights: a comparative perspective.
    Giesen D
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():273-309. PubMed ID: 10126941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consent in the 90's.
    Molnar J
    Med Law; 1997; 16(3):567-79. PubMed ID: 9409137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond Bolam: responding to the patient.
    Feenan DK
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 11653113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malpractice liability for the failure to adequately educate patients: the Australian law of "informed consent" and its implications for American ethics committees.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 8293226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of the doctrine of consent.
    Marks P
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 12617413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent in theory and practice: legal and medical perspectives on the informed consent doctrine and a proposed reconceptualization.
    Sprung CL; Winick BJ
    Crit Care Med; 1989 Dec; 17(12):1346-54. PubMed ID: 2686937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
    Monks SS
    Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal accountability for the provision of medical care: a comparative view.
    Giesen D
    J R Soc Med; 1993 Nov; 86(11):648-52. PubMed ID: 8258801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D; Hayes J
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are the courts excessively deferential to the medical profession?
    Woolf H
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 14682323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.