These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11789507)
41. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal. Brahams D Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Biomedicine: Convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine. Council of Europe Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Sep; 7(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 11660359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A doctor's duty of disclosure and the decline of 'The Bolam Test': A dramatic change in the law on patient consent. Badenoch J Med Leg J; 2016 Mar; 84(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 26683408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Informed consent and disclosure in the physician-patient relationship: expanding obligations for physicians in the United States. LeBlang TR Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):429-44. PubMed ID: 8868502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Informed consent for federal clinicians. Kapp MB Mil Med; 1989 May; 154(5):238-42. PubMed ID: 2499836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: the role of the law? Brazier M Leg Stud; 1987 Jul; 7(2):169-93. PubMed ID: 16100793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Negligence in securing informed consent and medical malpractice. Perry C J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1988; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 10296750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Seen but not heard? Children in clinical trials. Cave E Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 20129995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Informed consent: the dawning of a new era. Khalique Qc N Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 53(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 25943581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. After Bolam: what's the future for patient consent? The Lancet Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10057):2210. PubMed ID: 27825493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. English medical law and 'informed consent': an antipodean assessment and alternative. Skegg PD Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(2):135-65. PubMed ID: 11885607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Informed consent to medical treatment in the United States. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1979 Oct; 2(8):412, 414-5. PubMed ID: 400967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Informed consent, duty of disclosure and chiropractic: where are we? Simpson JK; Innes S Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Nov; 28(1):60. PubMed ID: 33148281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Informed consent: can a patient ever be fully informed? Lupton M Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 16258342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Informed consent: recent changes in the law. Boyarsky S J Urol; 1976 Aug; 116(2):226-7. PubMed ID: 950711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Law and medical experimentation: of embryos, children and others with limited legal capacity. Dworkin G Monash Univ Law Rev; 1987 Dec; 13(4):189-208. PubMed ID: 11659196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]