These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11789524)

  • 1. Protocol 126 and "The Hutch".
    Nelson RM
    IRB; 2001; 23(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 11789524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Death in gene therapy trial raises questions about private IRBs.
    Ledford H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1067. PubMed ID: 17921976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
    Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
    Benbow S
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethics of clinical trials: to inform or not inform? That is the question.
    Spence EH
    Prof Ethics; 1998; 6(3-4):173-84. PubMed ID: 11838496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Independent ethics committees for clinical research in Argentina. An evaluation and a system to guarantee their independence].
    Gonorazky SE
    Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18499958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protection of health research participants in the United States: a review of two cases.
    Douglass A; Crampton P
    N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Jun; 5(2):6-12. PubMed ID: 15597497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):58-61. PubMed ID: 16459415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women in early phase trials: an IRB's deliberations.
    Anderson JR; Schonfeld TL; Kelso TK; Prentice ED
    IRB; 2003; 25(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 14649248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
    de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How not to rethink research ethics.
    Beauchamp TL
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.