These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11789579)

  • 1. Car size and injury risk: a model for injury risk in frontal collisions.
    Wood DP; Simms CK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 Jan; 34(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 11789579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and the car size effect: a fundamental explanation.
    Wood DP
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Mar; 29(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 9088353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of the Japanese K-car in a real-world low-severity frontal collision.
    Hitosugi M; Matsui Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 24499113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics.
    Evans L
    Accid Anal Prev; 1994 Oct; 26(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 7999205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Car driver casualty rates in Great Britain by type of car.
    Broughton J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1543-52. PubMed ID: 18606288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Passenger car collision fatalities--with special emphasis on collisions with heavy vehicles.
    Björnstig U; Björnstig J; Eriksson A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 18215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crash fatality and vehicle incompatibility in collisions between cars and light trucks or vans.
    Ossiander EM; Koepsell TD; McKnight B
    Inj Prev; 2014 Dec; 20(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 24835235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vehicle registration year, age, and weight - Untangling the effects on crash risk.
    Høye A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():1-11. PubMed ID: 30447490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compatibility problems in frontal, side, single car collisions and car-to-pedestrian accidents in Japan.
    Mizuno K; Kajzer J
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999 Jul; 31(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 10384231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vehicle mass and injury risk in two-car crashes: A novel methodology.
    Tolouei R; Maher M; Titheridge H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():155-66. PubMed ID: 22579219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and prediction of traffic fatalities resulting from angle collisions including the effect of vehicles' configuration and compatibility.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):457-69. PubMed ID: 15003591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of vehicle mass, speed and safety belt wearing on the causes of death in road traffic accidents.
    Tolonen J; Kiviluoto O; Santavirta S; Slätis P
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 6732152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crash compatibility between cars and light trucks: benefits of lowering front-end energy-absorbing structure in SUVs and pickups.
    Baker BC; Nolan JM; O'Neill B; Genetos AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 18215539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Car occupant safety in frontal crashes: a parameter study of vehicle mass, impact speed, and inherent vehicle protection.
    Buzeman DG; Viano DC; Lövsund P
    Accid Anal Prev; 1998 Nov; 30(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 9805514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are SUVs dangerous vehicles?
    Keall MD; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):954-63. PubMed ID: 18460363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of relative collision safety including driver characteristics.
    Vadeby AM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Sep; 36(5):909-17. PubMed ID: 15203369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difference in severity and distribution of bodily injuries following collision between drivers of K-cars and standard vehicles.
    Inamasu J; Kujirai D; Izawa Y; Kase K; Shinozaki H
    Injury; 2019 Jan; 50(1):205-209. PubMed ID: 30268513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roof strength and injury risk in rollover crashes of passenger cars.
    Brumbelow ML; Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):584-92. PubMed ID: 19916130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?
    Li G; Wang F; Otte D; Cai Z; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():143-150. PubMed ID: 29571012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.