These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11790864)

  • 1. Initial contact angle measurements on variously treated dental/medical titanium materials.
    Lim YJ; Oshida Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(4):325-41. PubMed ID: 11790864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials.
    Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contact angle measurement on dental implant biomaterials.
    Mekayarajjananonth T; Winkler S
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 10823023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a niobium-containing titanium alloy on osteoblast behavior in culture.
    Shapira L; Klinger A; Tadir A; Wilensky A; Halabi A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 19530314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment.
    MacDonald DE; Rapuano BE; Deo N; Stranick M; Somasundaran P; Boskey AL
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(16):3135-46. PubMed ID: 14980408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
    Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
    Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
    Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An initial study of diffusion bonds between superplastic Ti-6Al-4V for implant dentistry applications.
    Elias KL; Daehn GS; Brantley WA; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):357-65. PubMed ID: 17618918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols.
    Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of a new porous surface for titanium implants.
    Simon M; Lagneau C; Moreno J; Lissac M; Dalard F; Grosgogeat B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 16324146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Ramaswamy Y; Wu C; Dunstan CR; Hewson B; Eindorf T; Anderson GI; Zreiqat H
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3192-204. PubMed ID: 19457458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study.
    Grössner-Schreiber B; Herzog M; Hedderich J; Dück A; Hannig M; Griepentrog M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 17092235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation of the responses of human osteoblast-like cells to physiologic mechanical strains by biomaterial surfaces.
    Di Palma F; Guignandon A; Chamson A; Lafage-Proust MH; Laroche N; Peyroche S; Vico L; Rattner A
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(20):4249-57. PubMed ID: 15683648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of various implant coatings on biological responses in MG63 using cDNA microarray.
    Kim CS; Sohn SH; Jeon SK; Kim KN; Ryu JJ; Kim MK
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):368-79. PubMed ID: 16629896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced osteoblast response to an equal channel angular pressing-processed pure titanium substrate with microrough surface topography.
    Park JW; Kim YJ; Park CH; Lee DH; Ko YG; Jang JH; Lee CS
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3272-80. PubMed ID: 19426841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein adsorption and osteoblast responses to heat-treated titanium surfaces.
    Bess E; Cavin R; Ma K; Ong JL
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 10635154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanics and electrostatics of the interactions between osteoblasts and titanium surface.
    Kabaso D; Gongadze E; Perutková S; Matschegewski C; Kralj-Iglic V; Beck U; van Rienen U; Iglic A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 May; 14(5):469-82. PubMed ID: 21516531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.