These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11791214)

  • 1. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.
    Douglas JA; Skol AD; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 11791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping.
    Ewen KR; Bahlo M; Treloar SA; Levinson DF; Mowry B; Barlow JW; Foote SJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 67(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 10924406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.
    Thompson CL; Baechle D; Lu Q; Mathew G; Song Y; Iyengar SK; Gray-McGuire C; Goddard KA
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S153. PubMed ID: 16451614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of multipoint methods for genotype error detection.
    Mukhopadhyay N; Buxbaum SG; Weeks DE
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):175-89. PubMed ID: 15812175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci.
    Wilson AF; Sorant AJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10762546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.
    Cheung CY; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 May; 38(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 24718985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis.
    Stringham HM; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 8808612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.
    Zou G; Pan D; Zhao H
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1161-73. PubMed ID: 12871922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring haplotypes from genotypes on a pedigree with mutations, genotyping errors and missing alleles.
    Wang WB; Jiang T
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Apr; 9(2):339-65. PubMed ID: 21523936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Gordon D; Heath SC; Liu X; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 69(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 11443542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A family-based likelihood ratio test for general pedigree structures that allows for genotyping error and missing data.
    Yang Y; Wise CA; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Hum Hered; 2008; 66(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 18382089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristic and influencing factors of Taqman genotyping calling error.
    Yu S; Li X; Liu X; Wang Y; Yu F; Xue Y; Mao Z; Wang C; Li W
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Nov; 32(9):e22613. PubMed ID: 29943492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: misassignment rates for SNPs and microsatellites.
    Lindholm E; Zhang J; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 15297805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power loss for multiallelic transmission/disequilibrium test when errors introduced: GAW11 simulated data.
    Gordon D; Matise TC; Heath SC; Ott J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S587-92. PubMed ID: 10597497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gordon D; Heath SC; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 1999 Mar; 49(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 10077724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.
    Lathrop GM; Hooper AB; Huntsman JW; Ward RH
    Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Mar; 35(2):241-62. PubMed ID: 6573130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals.
    Epstein MP; Duren WL; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Nov; 67(5):1219-31. PubMed ID: 11032786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.