These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11791674)

  • 1. How epicardial electrodes influence the transmembrane potential during a strong shock.
    Patel SG; Roth BJ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 29(11):1028-31. PubMed ID: 11791674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of plunge electrodes during electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue.
    Langrill DM; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 11585046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a bath on the epicardial transmembrane potential during internal defibrillation shocks.
    Latimer DC; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):612-4. PubMed ID: 10230141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How electrode size affects the electric potential distribution in cardiac tissue.
    Patel SG; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Sep; 47(9):1284-7. PubMed ID: 11008431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of plunge electrodes in active cardiac tissue with curving fibers.
    Beaudoin DL; Roth BJ
    Heart Rhythm; 2004 Oct; 1(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 15851202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct measurements of membrane time constant during defibrillation strength shocks.
    Sharma V; Qu F; Nikolski VP; DeGroot P; Efimov IR
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Apr; 4(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 17399638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Averaging over depth during optical mapping of unipolar stimulation.
    Janks DL; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):1051-4. PubMed ID: 12214878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the electric axis of stimulation on the induced transmembrane potentials in ellipsoidal bidomain heart.
    Entcheva E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 Mar; 28(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 10784089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a bipolar electrode in a conductive bath.
    Latimer DC; Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Dec; 45(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 9835193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.
    Clark DM; Pollard AE; Ideker RE; Knisley SB
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 10387137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intramural virtual electrodes in ventricular wall: effects on epicardial polarizations.
    Sharifov OF; Fast VG
    Circulation; 2004 May; 109(19):2349-56. PubMed ID: 15117837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses of the transmembrane potential of myocardial cells during a shock.
    Zhou X; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Apr; 6(4):252-63. PubMed ID: 7647950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of action potentials during extracellular electrical stimulation of long duration.
    Zhou X; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 8(7):779-89. PubMed ID: 9255685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac optical mapping under a translucent stimulation electrode.
    Liau J; Dumas J; Janks D; Roth BJ; Knisley SB
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 32(9):1202-10. PubMed ID: 15493508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode.
    Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8550059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of electroporation on transmembrane potential induced by defibrillation shocks.
    Krassowska W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 18(9 Pt 1):1644-60. PubMed ID: 7491308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual electrode effects in defibrillation.
    Trayanova N; Skouibine K; Moore P
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 1998; 69(2-3):387-403. PubMed ID: 9785947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue: a common mechanism for anodal and cathodal stimulation.
    Wikswo JP; Lin SF; Abbas RA
    Biophys J; 1995 Dec; 69(6):2195-210. PubMed ID: 8599628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The maximal downstroke of epicardial potentials as an index of electrical activity in mouse hearts.
    Sohn K; Sachse FB; Moreno AP; Ershler PR; Wende AR; Abel ED; Punske BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3175-83. PubMed ID: 21859611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.