These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11791938)

  • 1. Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability.
    Bell TS; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):514-22. PubMed ID: 11791938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition.
    Benki JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1689-705. PubMed ID: 12656401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
    Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
    Luce PA; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 9504270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayana S; Moshfegh A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 11392435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables.
    McArdle R; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):507-18. PubMed ID: 19253783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment.
    Bosman AJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1995; 34(5):260-84. PubMed ID: 8837785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Osberger MJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):470-81. PubMed ID: 8654902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.