These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11791939)

  • 1. Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Plyler PN; Ananthanarayan AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):523-33. PubMed ID: 11791939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels.
    Krishnan A
    Hear Res; 2002 Apr; 166(1-2):192-201. PubMed ID: 12062771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human frequency-following response: representation of tonal sweeps.
    Krishnan A; Parkinson J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 11025331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximations of steady-state vowels.
    Krishnan A
    Audiol Neurootol; 1999; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 9892760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
    Hedrick M; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
    Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.
    Won JH; Tremblay K; Clinard CG; Wright RA; Sagi E; Svirsky M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26826999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.
    Molis MR; Diedesch A; Gallun F; Leek MR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23007720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion of dichotic consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersa).
    Sathe NC; Kain A; Reiss LAJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan; 155(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 38174963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.