114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11793295)
1. [Reduction of radiation exposure by using storage phosphor radiography on pelvis and lumbar spine].
Heyne JP; Sehner J; Neumann R; Werner B; Adler R; Freesmeyer M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2002 Jan; 174(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 11793295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reduction of radiation dosage by using digital luminescence radiography on a hand phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Adler R; Freesmeyer M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 10961225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
Schreiner-Karoussou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation doses and image information in digital pelvimetry with a phosphorous screen.
Holje G; Jarlman O; Samuelsson L
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 9059425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems.
McVey G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):177-88. PubMed ID: 12684233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
