These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11793772)

  • 1. Comparison of marker intervals and number of sib pairs used for linkage analysis on simulated nuclear family data.
    Cheng R; Ma JZ; Elston RC; Li MD
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S748-53. PubMed ID: 11793772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power to localize the major gene for disease liability is increased after accounting for the effects of related quantitative phenotypes.
    Arya R; Duggirala R; Williams JT; Almasy L; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S774-8. PubMed ID: 11793776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.
    Sham PC; Purcell S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1527-32. PubMed ID: 11353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of novel and existing methods for detection of linkage disequilibrium using parent-child trios in the GAW12 genetic isolate simulated data.
    Bailey-Wilson JE; Sorant AJ; Malley JD; Presciuttini S; Redner RA; Severini TA; Badner JA; Pajevic S; Jufer R; Baffoe-Bonnie A; Kao L; Doan BQ; Goldstein JL; Holmes TN; Behneman D; Mandal DM; Turley TN; Weissbecker KA; O'Neill J; Pugh EW
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S378-83. PubMed ID: 11793703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we consider gene x environment interaction in the hunt for quantitative trait loci?
    Gauderman WJ; Morrison JL; Siegmund KD
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S831-6. PubMed ID: 11793788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two approaches for consolidating results from genome scans of complex traits: selection methods and scan statistics.
    Gordon D; Hoh J; Finch SJ; Levenstien MA; Edington J; Li W; Majewski J; Ott J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S396-402. PubMed ID: 11793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of variance components, ANOVA and regression of offspring on midparent (ROMP) methods for SNP markers.
    Pugh EW; Papanicolaou GJ; Justice CM; Roy-Gagnon MH; Sorant AJ; Kingman A; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S794-9. PubMed ID: 11793780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distribution of lod scores in oligogenic linkage analysis.
    Williams JT; North KE; Martin LJ; Comuzzie AG; Göring HH; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S805-10. PubMed ID: 11793782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allelic association in large pedigrees.
    Gutin A; Abkevich V; Camp NJ; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright L; Thomas A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S571-5. PubMed ID: 11793740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance components analysis for genetic linkage of time to onset for disease.
    Amos CI; Shete S; Gu X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S768-73. PubMed ID: 11793775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of variable marker density, principal components, and neural networks in the dissection of disease etiology.
    Pankratz N; Kirkwood SC; Flury L; Koller DL; Foroud T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S732-7. PubMed ID: 11793770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of marker heterozygosity and genetic heterogeneity on fine mapping.
    Heard-Costa NL; Demissie S; DeStefano AL; Knowlton BA; Maher NE; Myers RH; Volcjak JS; Wilk JB; Cupples LA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S467-72. PubMed ID: 11793720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-stage variable-stringency semiparametric method for mapping quantitative-trait loci with the use of genomewide-scan data on sib pairs.
    Ghosh S; Majumder PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1046-61. PubMed ID: 10712217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the effect of sampling strategies on the power of linkage analysis to identify pathway-specific loci underlying a complex disease.
    Guo X; Lin YC; Wang Y; Cheng LS; Yang H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S754-9. PubMed ID: 11793773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covariates in linkage analysis using sibling and cousin pairs.
    Saccone NL; Rochberg N; Neuman RJ; Rice JP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S540-5. PubMed ID: 11793733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical application of residuals from survival models in quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Yoo B; Pankratz VS; de Andrade M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S811-6. PubMed ID: 11793784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.