188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11793788)
1. Should we consider gene x environment interaction in the hunt for quantitative trait loci?
Gauderman WJ; Morrison JL; Siegmund KD
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S831-6. PubMed ID: 11793788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of preadjusting a quantitative phenotype prior to sib-pair linkage analysis when gene x environment interaction exists.
Mosley J; Conti DV; Elston RC; Witte JS
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S837-42. PubMed ID: 11793789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting genotype x age interaction.
Almasy L; Towne B; Peterson C; Blangero J
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S819-24. PubMed ID: 11793786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of marker intervals and number of sib pairs used for linkage analysis on simulated nuclear family data.
Cheng R; Ma JZ; Elston RC; Li MD
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S748-53. PubMed ID: 11793772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive analysis of complex traits in problem 2A.
Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Maestri NE; Prenger VL; Zeiger J; Lei HH; Coresh J
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 9433583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of parent-of-origin effects in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
Hanson RL; Kobes S; Lindsay RS; Knowler WC
Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 68(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 11254452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Replication of linkage to quantitative trait loci: variation in location and magnitude of the lod score.
Hsueh WC; Göring HH; Blangero J; Mitchell BD
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S473-8. PubMed ID: 11793721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of variable marker density, principal components, and neural networks in the dissection of disease etiology.
Pankratz N; Kirkwood SC; Flury L; Koller DL; Foroud T
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S732-7. PubMed ID: 11793770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new nonparametric linkage statistic for mapping both qualitative and quantitative trait loci.
Camp NJ; Gutin A; Abkevich V; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright L; Thomas A
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S461-6. PubMed ID: 11793719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of genotype-by-sex interaction on quantitative trait linkage analysis.
Towne B; Siervogel RM; Blangero J
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 9433623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
Forrest WF; Feingold E
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in randomly ascertained pedigrees: comparison of penetrance-based and variance component analysis.
Göring HH; Williams JT; Blangero J
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S783-8. PubMed ID: 11793778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling age x major gene interaction by a variance component approach.
Shete SS; Chen J; Zhou X; Amos CI
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S849-53. PubMed ID: 11793791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A two-stage variable-stringency semiparametric method for mapping quantitative-trait loci with the use of genomewide-scan data on sib pairs.
Ghosh S; Majumder PP
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1046-61. PubMed ID: 10712217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.
Wang D; Lin S; Cheng R; Gao X; Wright FA
Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1238-49. PubMed ID: 11309688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power of multipoint identity-by-descent methods to detect linkage using variance component models.
Ekstrøm CT
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11754465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Power to localize the major gene for disease liability is increased after accounting for the effects of related quantitative phenotypes.
Arya R; Duggirala R; Williams JT; Almasy L; Blangero J
Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S774-8. PubMed ID: 11793776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
