These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11794261)

  • 1. The performance of three vacuum-mixing cement guns--a comparison of the fatigue properties of simplex P cement.
    Yau WP; Ng TP; Chiu KY; Poon KC; Ho WY; Luk DK
    Int Orthop; 2001; 25(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 11794261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of the addition of methylene blue on the fatigue strength of Simplex P bone-cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    J Appl Biomater; 1992; 3(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10147706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fatigue properties of bone cement. Comparison of mixing techniques.
    Lindén U
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Aug; 60(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 2816319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.
    Struemph JM; Chong AC; Wooley PH
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():193-8. PubMed ID: 26361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.
    Fritsch EW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Aug; 31(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8836840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Greer JA; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jun; 21(6):719-30. PubMed ID: 3597461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the Advanced One-Step Mixing System Under Non-Vacuum on the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement.
    Schommer JV; Chong AC; Erickson TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 38919359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acrylic bone-cement. Influence of mixer design and unmixed powder.
    Kurdy NM; Hodgkinson JP; Haynes R
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Oct; 11(7):813-9. PubMed ID: 8934321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static and fatigue mechanical behavior of bone cement with elevated barium sulfate content for treatment of vertebral compression fractures.
    Kurtz SM; Villarraga ML; Zhao K; Edidin AA
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(17):3699-712. PubMed ID: 15621260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
    Kwong FN; Power RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal.
    Lewis G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 10634961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
    Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The strength of acrylic bone cement cured under thumb pressure.
    Klein RW; Scott CP; Higham PA
    Biomaterials; 2004 Feb; 25(5):943-7. PubMed ID: 14609683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.
    Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kaltenkirchen N
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1996; 115(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 8861576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.