These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11794303)
1. Preventing a brave new world: why we should ban human cloning now. Kass LR New Repub; 2001 May; 224(21):30-9. PubMed ID: 11794303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. Kass LR New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. Kass LR Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):679-705. PubMed ID: 12710451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To ban or not to ban? Gorman C Time; 1997 Jun; 149(24):66. PubMed ID: 11656687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Morality and biotechnology. Davis NA South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):355-71. PubMed ID: 11645839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human cloning and the law. Newman SA J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11657282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting the unconceived: nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology. Peters PG Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):487-548. PubMed ID: 11659319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fragmenting and reassembling the world: of flying squirrels, augmented persons, and other monsters. Shapiro MH Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):331-74. PubMed ID: 11652815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The prospect of cloning human beings: has knowledge leapt ahead of wisdom? Scheckel P DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999; 2(3):605-38. PubMed ID: 11658075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering. Rozovsky LE Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human cloning and the rights of human beings. Ayd FJ Med Moral Newsl; 1998; 35(5-6):17-23. PubMed ID: 11660579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. (Com)modifying experience. Altman S South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):293-340. PubMed ID: 11645837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The report on new reproductive technologies: will it lead to change, or gather dust? Gray C CMAJ; 1994 Jan; 150(2):266-8. PubMed ID: 11652722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human cloning: should the United States legislate against it? Yes: individual dignity demands nothing less ; No: the potential for good is too compelling. Annas GJ; Robertson JA ABA J; 1997 May; 83():80-1. PubMed ID: 11656683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cloning without human clones. Wadman M Wall St J (East Ed); 1998 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why human reproductive cloning should not in all cases be prohibited. Robertson JA N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15011711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why we should ban the cloning of human beings. Kass LR Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 15706722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Act on establishment of an ethical council and regulation of certain forms of biomedical experiments. Act. No. 353. Denmark LOVTID K DAN A; 1987 Jun; A():1-4. PubMed ID: 12085899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones. Ramsay S Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]