These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11794345)
1. Preemption and medical devices: a response to Adler and Mann. Hermann M; Ritts GJ Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11794345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(239):65384-8. PubMed ID: 10176832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Withdrawal of proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(142):39789-90. PubMed ID: 10181516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Correction. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(242):66179. PubMed ID: 10179302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal preemption of common law tort awards by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Carrier MK Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):509-611. PubMed ID: 11797729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Petrella ME Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Preemption of the "fraud on the FDA" exception to Michigan's tort immunity statute for drug manufacturers: reconsidering Garcia and Desiano after Levine. Murdey J Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(1):85-104, ii-iii. PubMed ID: 24505848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life after Riegel: a fresh look at medical device preemption one year after Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. Wartman GJ Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(2):291-311. PubMed ID: 19999286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The preemptive scope of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Sunshine PH Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 10342991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical device recalls from 2004 to 2006: a focus on Class I recalls. Villarraga ML; Guerin HL; Lam T Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 17915400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bad medicine: prescription drugs, preemption, and the potential for a no-fault fix. Smirniotopoulos A Rev Law Soc Change; 2012; 35(4):793-862. PubMed ID: 22363960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Injured consumers and the FDA. Should federal preemption protect medical device manufacturers under a quasi-governmental immunity? Truitt BI J Leg Med; 1994 Mar; 15(1):155-84. PubMed ID: 8201276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reassessing the law of preemption. Dinh VD Georgetown Law J; 2000 Jul; 88(7):2085-118. PubMed ID: 11503659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Safe Medical Devices Act: what it means in practice. DiMotto J Nurs Qual Connect; 1993; 3(3):1, 5. PubMed ID: 8274957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tort law deference to FDA regulation of medical devices. Green MD; Schultz WB Georgetown Law J; 2000 Jul; 88(7):2119-45. PubMed ID: 11503660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-decision diagnosis: medical device preemption alive and mostly well after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Sayler SW; Thomas SM Ann Health Law; 1997; 6():185-208. PubMed ID: 10184786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greater and lesser powers of tort reform: the primary jurisdiction doctrine and state-law claims concerning FDA-approved products. Struve CT Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):1039-74. PubMed ID: 18618970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]