These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11794654)

  • 21. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Membrane bioreactor versus conventional activated sludge system: population dynamics of nitrifiers.
    Manser R; Gujer W; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):417-25. PubMed ID: 16459817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
    Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of wastewater sludge characteristics to predict critical flux for membrane bioreactor processes.
    Fan F; Zhou H; Husain H
    Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 16360725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
    Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor and a full-scale sequencing batch reactor with sand filtration: treatment of low strength wastewater from a northern Canadian Aboriginal Community.
    Frederickson K; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):483-90. PubMed ID: 16004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consequences of mass transfer effects on the inetics of nitrifiers.
    Manser R; Gujer W; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4633-42. PubMed ID: 16290185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.
    Santos A; Judd S
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accumulation of biopolymer clusters in a submerged membrane bioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling.
    Wang XM; Li XY
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):855-62. PubMed ID: 17889249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fate of aromatic hydrocarbons in Italian municipal wastewater systems: an overview of wastewater treatment using conventional activated-sludge processes (CASP) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
    Fatone F; Di Fabio S; Bolzonella D; Cecchi F
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 20804998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
    Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
    Sarioglu M; Insel G; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment.
    Yoon SH; Kim HS; Yeom IT
    Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 14630101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
    Pollice A; Laera G; Blonda M
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1799-808. PubMed ID: 15026234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
    Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Important operational parameters of membrane bioreactor-sludge disintegration (MBR-SD) system for zero excess sludge production.
    Yoon SH
    Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1921-31. PubMed ID: 12697235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater.
    Satyawali Y; Balakrishnan M
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 19201006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation.
    Brannock M; Wang Y; Leslie G
    Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3181-91. PubMed ID: 20347471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.