These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11795746)

  • 1. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
    Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loosely implanted cementless stems may become rotationally stable after loading.
    Kannan A; Owen JR; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2231-6. PubMed ID: 24664196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis.
    Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Poremba C; Claes L; Steinbeck J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 May; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 12034119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of the Femoral Bone Cavity for Cementless Stems: Broaching vs Compaction. A Five-Year Randomized Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorption Study.
    Hjorth MH; Kold S; Søballe K; Langdahl BL; Nielsen PT; Christensen PH; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 28111123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction.
    Hjorth MH; Stilling M; Søballe K; Nielsen PT; Christensen PH; Kold S
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):575-582. PubMed ID: 27759486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems.
    Baleani M; Cristofolini L; Toni A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jun; 50(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 10756320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacted particulate allograft for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. In vitro mechanical stability and effects of cement pressurization.
    Berzins A; Sumner DR; Wasielewski RC; Galante JO
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 8872566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
    Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements.
    Howard JL; Hui AJ; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Rorabeck CH
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 15067636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a collar on subsidence and local micromotion of cementless femoral stems: in vitro comparative study based on micro-computerised tomography.
    Malfroy Camine V; Rüdiger HA; Pioletti DP; Terrier A
    Int Orthop; 2018 Jan; 42(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28589313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micromotion and subsidence of a cementless conical fluted stem depending on femoral defect size - A human cadaveric study.
    Ellenrieder M; Souffrant R; Schulze C; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105202. PubMed ID: 33129564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses.
    Phillips TW; Messieh SS; McDonald PD
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 May; 72(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 2341442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of cemented and cementless prostheses.
    Jasty M; Burke D; Harris WH
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 1297569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components.
    Burke DW; O'Connor DO; Zalenski EB; Jasty M; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jan; 73(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 1991771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twenty-Five- to Twenty-Seven-Year Results of a Cemented vs a Cementless Stem in the Same Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kim IW
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 26601637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial Stability of Cemented vs Cementless Tibial Components Under Cyclic Load.
    Crook PD; Owen JR; Hess SR; Al-Humadi SM; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2556-2562. PubMed ID: 28433426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.