These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11797813)

  • 1. The validation of the finite difference method and reciprocity for solving the inverse problem in EEG dipole source analysis.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 11797813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
    Wang Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-layer-isotropic skull conductivity representation in the EEG forward problem using spherical head models.
    Cuartas-Morales E; Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Castellanos-Dominguez G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4904-7. PubMed ID: 25571091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.
    Plummer C; Litewka L; Farish S; Harvey AS; Cook MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 118(11):2344-61. PubMed ID: 17889598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models.
    Berg P; Scherg M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 7509274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.