These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11797947)
1. Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: comparison of dynamic and segmental methods. Chui CS; Chan MF; Yorke E; Spirou S; Ling CC Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2441-9. PubMed ID: 11797947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery. Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator. Agazaryan N; Solberg TD Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1758-67. PubMed ID: 12906193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of a commercial multileaf collimator used for intensity modulated radiation therapy. Low DA; Sohn JW; Klein EE; Markman J; Mutic S; Dempsey JF Med Phys; 2001 May; 28(5):752-6. PubMed ID: 11393469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience. Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Burman C; Chui CS; Kutcher G; Leibel S; Zelefsky M; LoSasso T; Spirou S; Wu Q; Yang J; Stein J; Mohan R; Fuks Z; Ling CC Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Nov; 39(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 9369136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential dosing of prostate and seminal vesicles using dynamic multileaf collimation. Klein EE; Low DA; Sohn JW; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1447-56. PubMed ID: 11121647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy. Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system. MacKenzie MA; Lachaine M; Murray B; Fallone BG; Robinson D; Field GC J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 11958650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static versus dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Profile of integral dose in carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Jothybasu KS; Bahl A; Subramani V; Rath GK; Sharma DN; Julka PK J Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 34(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 20098539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of MLC leaf width on the planning and delivery of SMLC IMRT using the CORVUS inverse treatment planning system. Burmeister J; McDermott PN; Bossenberger T; Ben-Josef E; Levin K; Forman JD Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3187-93. PubMed ID: 15651601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cheng JC; Chao KS; Low D Int J Cancer; 2001 Apr; 96(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 11291096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning. Coselmon MM; Moran JM; Radawski JD; Fraass BA Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1234-45. PubMed ID: 15984674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning quality and delivery efficiency of sMLC delivered IMRT treatment of oropharyngeal cancers evaluated by RTOG H-0022 dosimetric criteria. Zhu XR; Schultz CJ; Gillin MT J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):80-95. PubMed ID: 15738923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological effect of different IMRT delivery techniques: SMLC, DMLC, and helical tomotherapy. Shaikh M; Burmeister J; Joiner M; Pandya S; Zhao B; Liu Q Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):762-70. PubMed ID: 20229886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Delivery time comparison for intensity-modulated radiation therapy with/without flattening filter: a planning study. Fu W; Dai J; Hu Y; Han D; Song Y Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1535-47. PubMed ID: 15152690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. Xia P; Pickett B; Vigneault E; Verhey LJ; Roach M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Sep; 51(1):244-54. PubMed ID: 11516874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Vicini FA; Sharpe M; Kestin L; Martinez A; Mitchell CK; Wallace MF; Matter R; Wong J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Dec; 54(5):1336-44. PubMed ID: 12459355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]