These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11798043)

  • 1. Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment.
    Butler JJ; Healey JM; McCall GW; Garnett EJ; Loheide SP
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 11798043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Permeability profiles in granular aquifers using flowmeters in direct-push wells.
    Paradis D; Lefebvre R; Morin RH; Gloaguen E
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):534-47. PubMed ID: 20880040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.
    Butler JJ; Dietrich P; Wittig V; Christy T
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 17600571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated sediments.
    Dietze M; Dietrich P
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 21883188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: coupling electrical logging and slug tests.
    Sellwood SM; Healey JM; Birk S; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 15726921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation.
    Köber R; Hornbruch G; Leven C; Tischer L; Grossmann J; Dietrich P; Weiss H; Dahmke A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 19341375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells.
    Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 12019645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Filtration and transport of Bacillus subtilis spores and the F-RNA phage MS2 in a coarse alluvial gravel aquifer: implications in the estimation of setback distances.
    Pang L; Close M; Goltz M; Noonan M; Sinton L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Apr; 77(3):165-94. PubMed ID: 15763354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of steady-state hydraulic tomography to inform the selection of a chaotic advection system.
    Cho MS; Zhao Z; Thomson NR; Illman WA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Feb; 229():103559. PubMed ID: 31784037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Simple Field Method for Assessing Near-Surface Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity.
    Lewis J
    Ground Water; 2016 Sep; 54(5):740-744. PubMed ID: 26867037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating biozone hydraulic conductivity in wastewater soil-infiltration systems using inverse numerical modeling.
    Bumgarner JR; McCray JE
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 17449084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations.
    Dietrich P; Butler JJ; Faiss K
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 18307433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Alexander M; Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21671501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inherent limitations of hydraulic tomography.
    Bohling GC; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):809-24. PubMed ID: 20860689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and application of a direct-push vadose zone gravel permeameter.
    Miller RB; Heeren DM; Fox GA; Storm DE; Halihan T
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 21306360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined use of field and laboratory testing to predict preferred flow paths in an heterogeneous aquifer.
    Gierczak RF; Devlin JF; Rudolph DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):75-98. PubMed ID: 16246459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution slug testing.
    Zemansky GM; McElwee CD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 15819943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation Assessment of Direct Push Injection Logging for High-Resolution Aquifer Characterization.
    Liu G; Borden RC; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2019 Jul; 57(4):562-574. PubMed ID: 30178579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of shallow submerged sediments.
    Kelly SE; Murdoch LC
    Ground Water; 2003; 41(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 12873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds.
    Landon MK; Rus DL; Harvey FE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(6):870-85. PubMed ID: 11708453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.